R9N vs K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
BUY
78/100
+10 points over R9N
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
R9N
Renault
0
/ 100
BUY
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Renault
Specifications
R9N
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Brand
Renault
Renault
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
BUY
Reliability
68
78
Years
2018--present
2010--2020
Displacement
1749 cc
1461 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Diesel
Diesel
Power
120--150 hp
75--110 hp
Known Issues
1
3
Total Risk Cost
€300--€1,000
€1,300--€3,100
Character
R9N
"Kadjar/Koleos/Scenic. Replaced R9M. Improved DPF regeneration strategy. Twin-dosing SCR. Still diesel = DPF concerns in city use. Highway use recommended."
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
"Revised K9K. Improved turbo and injectors. Still Europes most common small diesel. Proven long-distance."
Issues Comparison
R9N 1
● MODERATE
DPF in city driving
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010) 3
▲ HIGH
Timing belt — INTERFERENCE ENGINE (critical)
● MODERATE
EGR fouling + DPF (city use)
● MODERATE
Turbocharger wear at high mileage