R9N vs F7P
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
F7P
ACCEPTABLE
76/100
+8 points over R9N
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
R9N
Renault
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
F7P
Renault
Specifications
R9N
F7P
Brand
Renault
Renault
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
68
76
Years
2018--present
1991--1998
Displacement
1749 cc
1764 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Diesel
Petrol Na
Power
120--150 hp
137 hp
Known Issues
1
1
Total Risk Cost
€300--€1,000
€250--€500
Character
R9N
"Kadjar/Koleos/Scenic. Replaced R9M. Improved DPF regeneration strategy. Twin-dosing SCR. Still diesel = DPF concerns in city use. Highway use recommended."
F7P
"Clio Williams, R19 16S. Early F-family hot hatch engine. 137hp NA — feels quick in a light Clio. Timing belt. High-revving. The Clio Williams is a French icon with this engine."
Issues Comparison
R9N 1
● MODERATE
DPF in city driving
F7P 1
▲ HIGH
Timing belt (interference)