M5M vs K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
BUY
78/100
+10 points over M5M
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
M5M
Renault
0
/ 100
BUY
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Renault
Specifications
M5M
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Brand
Renault
Renault
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
BUY
Reliability
68
78
Years
2013--2020
2010--2020
Displacement
1618 cc
1461 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Petrol Turbo
Diesel
Power
150--220 hp
75--110 hp
Known Issues
2
3
Total Risk Cost
€500--€2,000
€1,300--€3,100
Character
M5M
"Megane III RS, Clio IV RS. 1.6 turbo. DCT gearbox in Clio RS controversial. Engine itself: turbo failure at high mileage, oil consumption under hard use. Strong tuning platform. RS Trophy 220hp variant."
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
"Revised K9K. Improved turbo and injectors. Still Europes most common small diesel. Proven long-distance."
Issues Comparison
M5M 2
▲ HIGH
Turbo failure at high mileage
● MODERATE
Oil consumption under hard use
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010) 3
▲ HIGH
Timing belt — INTERFERENCE ENGINE (critical)
● MODERATE
EGR fouling + DPF (city use)
● MODERATE
Turbocharger wear at high mileage