4B11 vs 6G74
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
4B11
ACCEPTABLE
75/100
+3 points over 6G74
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
4B11
Mitsubishi
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
6G74
Mitsubishi
Specifications
4B11
6G74
Brand
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
75
72
Years
2007--2017
1997--2006
Displacement
1998 cc
3497 cc
Layout
I4
V6
Type
Petrol Na
Petrol Na
Power
150 hp
203 hp
Known Issues
0
1
Total Risk Cost
€0--€0
€300--€800
Character
4B11
"ASX/Lancer/Outlander. Simple, reliable. Chain-driven. No frills, no drama."
6G74
"Pajero. GDI direct injection on later variants (problematic). NA MPFI version more reliable. Timing belt. Oil consumption. Adequate torque for Pajero."
Issues Comparison
4B11 0
No documented issues.
6G74 1
● MODERATE
GDI carbon buildup (DI variants)
Models
4B11 46
Space Star
Space Star
Colt
Space Star
Space Star
Colt
Lancer
Colt
Lancer
ASX
Lancer
Lancer
Outlander
ASX
Outlander
Outlander
Lancer Evo
Lancer
Lancer Evo
Lancer Evo
Outlander
Outlander
Outlander
Eclipse Cross
Outlander PHEV
Outlander PHEV
Outlander
Eclipse Cross
Eclipse Cross
Eclipse Cross
Outlander
Lancer
Galant
Lancer Evo
Lancer Evo
Lancer Evo
Grandis
Outlander
Carisma
Pajero Pinin
Pajero Pinin
Outlander
Lancer 1.8 MIVEC
Lancer 2.0 MIVEC
Outlander 2.0 MIVEC
Outlander PHEV