BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D vs 6G74

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
6G74 ACCEPTABLE 72/100
+12 points over BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D
0 / 100
CAUTION BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D Mitsubishi
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 6G74 Mitsubishi

Specifications

BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D
6G74
Brand
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Verdict
CAUTION
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
60
72
Years
2007--2012
1997--2006
Displacement
1968 cc
3497 cc
Layout
I4
V6
Type
Diesel
Petrol Na
Power
136--140 hp
203 hp
Known Issues
2
1
Total Risk Cost
€1,300--€3,200
€300--€800

Character

BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D

"Outlander/ASX. VW PD (pump-düse) engine sourced for Mitsubishi. Same PD injector issues. DMF. DPF. Camshaft wear on PD engines. Not well-suited for Mitsubishi application."

6G74

"Pajero. GDI direct injection on later variants (problematic). NA MPFI version more reliable. Timing belt. Oil consumption. Adequate torque for Pajero."

Issues Comparison

BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D 2

▲ HIGH
DMF failure €500--€1,200 80,000 km--150,000 km
▲ HIGH
Camshaft wear (PD engine) €800--€2,000 80,000 km--150,000 km

6G74 1

● MODERATE
GDI carbon buildup (DI variants) €300--€800 60,000 km--120,000 km

Models

BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D 4

Grandis NA 2005--2011 Outlander CU 2006--2006 Lancer CS 2006--2007 Lancer CY/CZ 2008--2013

6G74 1

Pajero V60/V70 2000--2006
Full BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D Report Full 6G74 Report