6G74 vs 4B11
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
4B11
ACCEPTABLE
75/100
+3 points over 6G74
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
6G74
Mitsubishi
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
4B11
Mitsubishi
Specifications
6G74
4B11
Brand
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
72
75
Years
1997--2006
2007--2017
Displacement
3497 cc
1998 cc
Layout
V6
I4
Type
Petrol Na
Petrol Na
Power
203 hp
150 hp
Known Issues
1
0
Total Risk Cost
€300--€800
€0--€0
Character
6G74
"Pajero. GDI direct injection on later variants (problematic). NA MPFI version more reliable. Timing belt. Oil consumption. Adequate torque for Pajero."
4B11
"ASX/Lancer/Outlander. Simple, reliable. Chain-driven. No frills, no drama."
Issues Comparison
6G74 1
● MODERATE
GDI carbon buildup (DI variants)
4B11 0
No documented issues.
Models
6G74 1
4B11 46
Space Star
Space Star
Colt
Space Star
Space Star
Colt
Lancer
Colt
Lancer
ASX
Lancer
Lancer
Outlander
ASX
Outlander
Outlander
Lancer Evo
Lancer
Lancer Evo
Lancer Evo
Outlander
Outlander
Outlander
Eclipse Cross
Outlander PHEV
Outlander PHEV
Outlander
Eclipse Cross
Eclipse Cross
Eclipse Cross
Outlander
Lancer
Galant
Lancer Evo
Lancer Evo
Lancer Evo
Grandis
Outlander
Carisma
Pajero Pinin
Pajero Pinin
Outlander
Lancer 1.8 MIVEC
Lancer 2.0 MIVEC
Outlander 2.0 MIVEC
Outlander PHEV