2.5 FHEV/PHEV vs Sigma 1.25

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
Sigma 1.25 BUY 78/100
+6 points over 2.5 FHEV/PHEV
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 2.5 FHEV/PHEV Ford
0 / 100
BUY Sigma 1.25 Ford

Specifications

2.5 FHEV/PHEV
Sigma 1.25
Brand
Ford
Ford
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
BUY
Reliability
72
78
Years
2020--present
1996--2017
Displacement
2488 cc
1242 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Hybrid
Petrol Na
Power
190--225 hp
60--82 hp
Known Issues
1
1
Total Risk Cost
€1,000--€5,000
€50--€150

Character

2.5 FHEV/PHEV

"Kuga/Galaxy/S-MAX FHEV/PHEV. Toyota-style Atkinson cycle. CVT. PHEV battery concerns at high mileage. Engine itself is Mazda-Ford co-developed. Reliable hybrid system."

Sigma 1.25

"Fiesta/Ka. Simple Yamaha co-developed engine. Timing chain (good). Reliable. Low power. Thermostat housing. Coil pack. Perfect first car/city car engine."

Issues Comparison

2.5 FHEV/PHEV 1

● MODERATE
PHEV battery degradation €1,000--€5,000 60,000 km--150,000 km

Sigma 1.25 1

○ MINOR
Thermostat housing crack €50--€150 60,000 km--120,000 km

Models

2.5 FHEV/PHEV 4

Galaxy Mk3 (CD390) 2020--2023 Kuga Mk3 2020--present S-Max Mk2 (CD390) 2020--2023 Kuga Mk3 2020--present

Sigma 1.25 3

Fiesta Mk6 (JD/JH) 2002--2008 Fiesta Mk7 (JA8) 2008--2017 Fiesta Mk7 (JA8) 2008--2017
Full 2.5 FHEV/PHEV Report Full Sigma 1.25 Report