M9T vs F7P

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
F7P ACCEPTABLE 76/100
+4 points over M9T
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE M9T Renault
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE F7P Renault

Specifications

M9T
F7P
Brand
Renault
Renault
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
72
76
Years
2010--present
1991--1998
Displacement
2299 cc
1764 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Diesel
Petrol Na
Power
100--180 hp
137 hp
Known Issues
2
1
Total Risk Cost
€700--€2,000
€250--€500

Character

M9T

"Master, Trafic III. Commercial vehicle workhorse. Common rail. DPF/SCR on newer versions. Timing chain. Injector failures at high mileage. Strong for commercial use. Good parts availability."

F7P

"Clio Williams, R19 16S. Early F-family hot hatch engine. 137hp NA — feels quick in a light Clio. Timing belt. High-revving. The Clio Williams is a French icon with this engine."

Issues Comparison

M9T 2

▲ HIGH
Injector issues at high mileage €500--€1,500 150,000 km--250,000 km
● MODERATE
EGR fouling €200--€500 80,000 km--150,000 km

F7P 1

▲ HIGH
Timing belt (interference) €250--€500 60,000 km--80,000 km

Models

M9T 7

Master III (FV) 2010--present Master III (FV) 2010--present Master III (FV) 2014--present Master III (FV) 2016--present Master III (FV) 2019--present Master III (FV) 2010--present Master III (FV) 2016--present

F7P 3

Laguna I (B56) 1994--2001 Laguna I (B56) 1994--2001 Clio I (B/C57) 1991--1995
Full M9T Report Full F7P Report