K7J/K7M vs K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
K7J/K7M
BUY
82/100
+4 points over K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
0
/ 100
BUY
K7J/K7M
Renault
0
/ 100
BUY
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Renault
Specifications
K7J/K7M
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Brand
Renault
Renault
Verdict
BUY
BUY
Reliability
82
78
Years
1995--2015
2010--2020
Displacement
1598 cc
1461 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Petrol Na
Diesel
Power
75--90 hp
75--110 hp
Known Issues
1
3
Total Risk Cost
€200--€400
€1,300--€3,100
Character
K7J/K7M
"Clio/Logan/Sandero. Simplest Renault engine. 8-valve, timing belt. Nearly unbreakable with basic maintenance. Dacia fleet favourite. Low power, high durability."
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
"Revised K9K. Improved turbo and injectors. Still Europes most common small diesel. Proven long-distance."
Issues Comparison
K7J/K7M 1
● MODERATE
Timing belt replacement
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010) 3
▲ HIGH
Timing belt — INTERFERENCE ENGINE (critical)
● MODERATE
EGR fouling + DPF (city use)
● MODERATE
Turbocharger wear at high mileage