H4D vs F7P

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
F7P ACCEPTABLE 76/100
+4 points over H4D
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE H4D Renault
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE F7P Renault

Specifications

H4D
F7P
Brand
Renault
Renault
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
72
76
Years
2019--present
1991--1998
Displacement
999 cc
1764 cc
Layout
I3
I4
Type
Petrol Na
Petrol Na
Power
65 hp
137 hp
Known Issues
1
1
Total Risk Cost
€0--€0
€250--€500

Character

H4D

"Clio V/Sandero III base engine. 3-cylinder NA. Simple, fuel efficient. Too new for long-term data. No known major issues yet."

F7P

"Clio Williams, R19 16S. Early F-family hot hatch engine. 137hp NA — feels quick in a light Clio. Timing belt. High-revving. The Clio Williams is a French icon with this engine."

Issues Comparison

H4D 1

○ MINOR
No significant issues known yet €0--€0 0 km--0 km

F7P 1

▲ HIGH
Timing belt (interference) €250--€500 60,000 km--80,000 km

Models

H4D 0

No models listed.

F7P 3

Laguna I (B56) 1994--2001 Laguna I (B56) 1994--2001 Clio I (B/C57) 1991--1995
Full H4D Report Full F7P Report