XU10 2.0 vs DV5 BlueHDi

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
XU10 2.0 ACCEPTABLE 74/100
+2 points over DV5 BlueHDi
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE XU10 2.0 PSA
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE DV5 BlueHDi PSA

Specifications

XU10 2.0
DV5 BlueHDi
Brand
PSA
PSA
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
74
72
Years
1992--2002
2017--present
Displacement
1998 cc
1499 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Petrol Na
Diesel
Power
132--167 hp
75--130 hp
Known Issues
1
1
Total Risk Cost
€250--€500
€300--€1,000

Character

XU10 2.0

"405/406/Xantia. Older XU family — cast iron block. Turbo 16V version (RFS) in 405 T16. Timing belt. Head gasket on turbo variants. Simple, proven, cheap parts. RFS turbo is a classic."

DV5 BlueHDi

"308/3008/C4/Berlingo. Replaced DV6. AdBlue/SCR system. DPF standard. Improved over DV6 but still diesel = city driving concern. Highway use: excellent economy and reliability."

Issues Comparison

XU10 2.0 1

▲ HIGH
Timing belt (interference) €250--€500 60,000 km--90,000 km

DV5 BlueHDi 1

● MODERATE
DPF in city driving €300--€1,000 60,000 km--120,000 km

Models

XU10 2.0 5

206 T1 1999--2007 206 2A/C 1999--2006 406 — 1996--2004 306 N3/N5 1993--2002 306 N3/N5 1994--2002

DV5 BlueHDi 1

106 1A/1C 1994--2003
Full XU10 2.0 Report Full DV5 BlueHDi Report