TU3 1.4 vs DW10 2.0 HDi/BlueHDi
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
DW10 2.0 HDi/BlueHDi
BUY
78/100
+2 points over TU3 1.4
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
TU3 1.4
PSA
0
/ 100
BUY
DW10 2.0 HDi/BlueHDi
PSA
Specifications
TU3 1.4
DW10 2.0 HDi/BlueHDi
Brand
PSA
PSA
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
BUY
Reliability
76
78
Years
1996--2014
2001--2020
Displacement
1360 cc
1997 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Petrol Na
Diesel
Power
73--75 hp
136--180 hp
Known Issues
2
2
Total Risk Cost
€500--€1,100
€1,200--€3,000
Character
TU3 1.4
"15 million TU engines made. Simple cast iron block. Timing belt (not chain). Head gasket can fail on very old units. Incredibly cheap to maintain. 206/207/C3 workhorse. Over-engineered for what it does."
DW10 2.0 HDi/BlueHDi
"508/3008/5008 workhorse. Strong torque. Reliable highway engine. DPF needs care."
Issues Comparison
TU3 1.4 2
▲ HIGH
Timing belt (interference engine)
● MODERATE
Head gasket weeping (very old units)
DW10 2.0 HDi/BlueHDi 2
▲ HIGH
DPF blockage — city use
▲ HIGH
Dual mass flywheel (DMF) wear
Models
DW10 2.0 HDi/BlueHDi 64
607
406
307
406
307
406
406
308
Expert
508
3008
407
5008
607
308
3008
407
308
308
508
RCZ
407
ProAce
Expert
Expert
Expert
508
308
508
508
3008
308
5008
DS7
3008
C4
5008
3008
308
508
C5 Aircross
508
508
308
5008
3008
306
Partner
206
206
Expert
Expert
407
407
Boxer
Boxer
607
406
406
Boxer
Boxer
406
C5 Aircross 2.0 BlueHDi
DS7 Crossback 2.0 BlueHDi