PureTech 1.2 NA (EB2) vs BlueHDi 1.5 (DV5)

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
BlueHDi 1.5 (DV5) ACCEPTABLE 74/100
+2 points over PureTech 1.2 NA (EB2)
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE PureTech 1.2 NA (EB2) PSA
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE BlueHDi 1.5 (DV5) PSA

Specifications

PureTech 1.2 NA (EB2)
BlueHDi 1.5 (DV5)
Brand
PSA
PSA
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
72
74
Years
2012--present
2018--present
Displacement
1199 cc
1499 cc
Layout
I3
I4
Type
Petrol Na
Diesel
Power
68--82 hp
100--131 hp
Known Issues
0
2
Total Risk Cost
€0--€0
€400--€1,500

Character

PureTech 1.2 NA (EB2)

"Non-turbo version. Simpler, fewer issues than turbo. 208/C3 base engine. Adequate city car."

BlueHDi 1.5 (DV5)

"Replaced 1.6 HDi. 308/3008/C4/Corsa diesel. Camshaft chain improved on later production. Good commuter."

Issues Comparison

PureTech 1.2 NA (EB2) 0

No documented issues.

BlueHDi 1.5 (DV5) 2

○ MINOR
DPF — better than older PSA diesels €300--€900 80,000 km--150,000 km
○ MINOR
AdBlue / SCR system faults €100--€600 30,000 km--∞

Models

PureTech 1.2 NA (EB2) 12

C3 A51 2012--2016 C1 B4 2014--2022 108 — 2014--2021 208 P21 2019--present 208 A9 2012--2019 108 — 2014--2021 2008 A94 2013--2019 208 CA/CC 2012--2019 106 1A/1C 1996--2003 206 T1 1998--2012 C3 FC 2002--2009 206 2A/C 1998--2006

BlueHDi 1.5 (DV5) 7

2008 1.6 BlueHDi A94 2013--2022 SUV 3008 1.5 BlueHDi P84 2016--2022 SUV 308 1.6 BlueHDi T9 2013--2021 Hatchback Berlingo 1.5 BlueHDi K9 2018--2024 MPV C5 Aircross 1.5 BlueHDi E3 2017--2022 SUV DS7 Crossback 1.5 BlueHDi X74 2017--2024 SUV Grandland 1.5 BlueHDi A18 2017--2024 SUV
Full PureTech 1.2 NA (EB2) Report Full BlueHDi 1.5 (DV5) Report