DW10 HDi/BlueHDi vs TU3 1.4
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
TU3 1.4
ACCEPTABLE
76/100
+6 points over DW10 HDi/BlueHDi
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
DW10 HDi/BlueHDi
PSA
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
TU3 1.4
PSA
Specifications
DW10 HDi/BlueHDi
TU3 1.4
Brand
PSA
PSA
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
70
76
Years
1999--2021
1996--2014
Displacement
1997 cc
1360 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Diesel
Petrol Na
Power
90--180 hp
73--75 hp
Known Issues
2
2
Total Risk Cost
€900--€2,400
€500--€1,100
Character
DW10 HDi/BlueHDi
"406/407/508/3008/C5. Workhorse diesel. Dual-mass flywheel. Injectors on high-mileage units. DPF on post-2006. Turbo actuator. Well-understood engine with good specialist support."
TU3 1.4
"15 million TU engines made. Simple cast iron block. Timing belt (not chain). Head gasket can fail on very old units. Incredibly cheap to maintain. 206/207/C3 workhorse. Over-engineered for what it does."
Issues Comparison
DW10 HDi/BlueHDi 2
▲ HIGH
Dual-mass flywheel
▲ HIGH
Injector failure at high mileage
TU3 1.4 2
▲ HIGH
Timing belt (interference engine)
● MODERATE
Head gasket weeping (very old units)