DT17 2.7 HDi V6 vs TU3 1.4
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
TU3 1.4
ACCEPTABLE
76/100
+28 points over DT17 2.7 HDi V6
0
/ 100
CAUTION
DT17 2.7 HDi V6
PSA
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
TU3 1.4
PSA
Specifications
DT17 2.7 HDi V6
TU3 1.4
Brand
PSA
PSA
Verdict
CAUTION
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
48
76
Years
2005--2011
1996--2014
Displacement
2720 cc
1360 cc
Layout
V6
I4
Type
Diesel
Petrol Na
Power
204 hp
73--75 hp
Known Issues
2
2
Total Risk Cost
€1,800--€5,500
€500--€1,100
Character
DT17 2.7 HDi V6
"407/607/C5/C6. Ford-PSA-Jaguar co-developed V6 diesel (same as Jaguar/Land Rover 2.7 TDV6). Turbo failure. Injector issues. DPF. Timing chain. Complex and expensive to maintain."
TU3 1.4
"15 million TU engines made. Simple cast iron block. Timing belt (not chain). Head gasket can fail on very old units. Incredibly cheap to maintain. 206/207/C3 workhorse. Over-engineered for what it does."
Issues Comparison
DT17 2.7 HDi V6 2
▲ HIGH
Turbo failure
▲ HIGH
Timing chain issues
TU3 1.4 2
▲ HIGH
Timing belt (interference engine)
● MODERATE
Head gasket weeping (very old units)