DW10 2.0 HDi/BlueHDi vs TU3 1.4
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
DW10 2.0 HDi/BlueHDi
BUY
78/100
+2 points over TU3 1.4
0
/ 100
BUY
DW10 2.0 HDi/BlueHDi
PSA
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
TU3 1.4
PSA
Specifications
DW10 2.0 HDi/BlueHDi
TU3 1.4
Brand
PSA
PSA
Verdict
BUY
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
78
76
Years
2001--2020
1996--2014
Displacement
1997 cc
1360 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Diesel
Petrol Na
Power
136--180 hp
73--75 hp
Known Issues
2
2
Total Risk Cost
€1,200--€3,000
€500--€1,100
Character
DW10 2.0 HDi/BlueHDi
"508/3008/5008 workhorse. Strong torque. Reliable highway engine. DPF needs care."
TU3 1.4
"15 million TU engines made. Simple cast iron block. Timing belt (not chain). Head gasket can fail on very old units. Incredibly cheap to maintain. 206/207/C3 workhorse. Over-engineered for what it does."
Issues Comparison
DW10 2.0 HDi/BlueHDi 2
▲ HIGH
DPF blockage — city use
▲ HIGH
Dual mass flywheel (DMF) wear
TU3 1.4 2
▲ HIGH
Timing belt (interference engine)
● MODERATE
Head gasket weeping (very old units)
Models
DW10 2.0 HDi/BlueHDi 64
607
406
307
406
307
406
406
308
Expert
308
607
5008
407
3008
508
3008
407
308
RCZ
508
308
407
Expert
Expert
Expert
ProAce
508
308
308
5008
3008
508
508
3008
3008
308
C5 Aircross
C4
DS7
508
5008
5008
508
508
3008
308
Partner
206
306
206
Expert
Expert
407
407
Boxer
Boxer
406
607
406
Boxer
Boxer
406
C5 Aircross 2.0 BlueHDi
DS7 Crossback 2.0 BlueHDi