1.6 Turbo (A16LET/B16SHT) vs 2.0 CDTi (A20DTH)
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
2.0 CDTi (A20DTH)
ACCEPTABLE
76/100
+18 points over 1.6 Turbo (A16LET/B16SHT)
0
/ 100
CAUTION
1.6 Turbo (A16LET/B16SHT)
Opel
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
2.0 CDTi (A20DTH)
Opel
Specifications
1.6 Turbo (A16LET/B16SHT)
2.0 CDTi (A20DTH)
Brand
Opel
Opel
Verdict
CAUTION
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
58
76
Years
2007--2018
2008--2018
Displacement
1598 cc
1956 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Petrol Turbo
Diesel
Power
170--200 hp
160--195 hp
Known Issues
6
0
Total Risk Cost
€3,100--€7,400
€0--€0
Character
1.6 Turbo (A16LET/B16SHT)
"A16LET is the problem child — timing chain, turbo, HPFP. Later B16SHT much better. Service history essential."
2.0 CDTi (A20DTH)
"Insignia/Zafira. Strong torque. Reliable for GM diesel. DMF wear. Good highway."
Issues Comparison
1.6 Turbo (A16LET/B16SHT) 6
◆ CRITICAL
Timing chain stretch + tensioner failure
▲ HIGH
High-pressure fuel pump failure
▲ HIGH
Turbocharger failure
● MODERATE
Ignition coil failure under boost
● MODERATE
Carbon buildup (direct injection)
● MODERATE
Water pump failure
2.0 CDTi (A20DTH) 0
No documented issues.