1.6 Turbo (A16LET/B16SHT) vs X10XE/Z10XE 1.0
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
X10XE/Z10XE 1.0
ACCEPTABLE
76/100
+18 points over 1.6 Turbo (A16LET/B16SHT)
0
/ 100
CAUTION
1.6 Turbo (A16LET/B16SHT)
Opel
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
X10XE/Z10XE 1.0
Opel
Specifications
1.6 Turbo (A16LET/B16SHT)
X10XE/Z10XE 1.0
Brand
Opel
Opel
Verdict
CAUTION
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
58
76
Years
2007--2018
1996--2006
Displacement
1598 cc
998 cc
Layout
I4
I3
Type
Petrol Turbo
Petrol Na
Power
170--200 hp
54--60 hp
Known Issues
6
1
Total Risk Cost
€3,100--€7,400
€200--€500
Character
1.6 Turbo (A16LET/B16SHT)
"A16LET is the problem child — timing chain, turbo, HPFP. Later B16SHT much better. Service history essential."
X10XE/Z10XE 1.0
"Corsa B/C, Agila. 3-cylinder. Simple, fuel efficient. Head gasket can weep at high mileage. Timing chain. Low power but cheap and reliable city car engine."
Issues Comparison
1.6 Turbo (A16LET/B16SHT) 6
◆ CRITICAL
Timing chain stretch + tensioner failure
▲ HIGH
High-pressure fuel pump failure
▲ HIGH
Turbocharger failure
● MODERATE
Ignition coil failure under boost
● MODERATE
Carbon buildup (direct injection)
● MODERATE
Water pump failure
X10XE/Z10XE 1.0 1
● MODERATE
Head gasket weep