OM639 1.5d vs 6G74

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
6G74 ACCEPTABLE 72/100
+10 points over OM639 1.5d
0 / 100
CAUTION OM639 1.5d Mitsubishi
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 6G74 Mitsubishi

Specifications

OM639 1.5d
6G74
Brand
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Verdict
CAUTION
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
62
72
Years
2004--2012
1997--2006
Displacement
1493 cc
3497 cc
Layout
I3
V6
Type
Diesel
Petrol Na
Power
68--95 hp
203 hp
Known Issues
1
1
Total Risk Cost
€400--€1,000
€300--€800

Character

OM639 1.5d

"Colt VI. Smart/Mitsubishi joint diesel. 3-cylinder. DPF on higher output. Turbo failure on 95hp version. Swirl flap. Not widely understood by general mechanics."

6G74

"Pajero. GDI direct injection on later variants (problematic). NA MPFI version more reliable. Timing belt. Oil consumption. Adequate torque for Pajero."

Issues Comparison

OM639 1.5d 1

▲ HIGH
Turbo failure (95hp version) €400--€1,000 60,000 km--120,000 km

6G74 1

● MODERATE
GDI carbon buildup (DI variants) €300--€800 60,000 km--120,000 km

Models

OM639 1.5d 2

Colt Z30 2004--2012 Colt Z30 2004--2008

6G74 1

Pajero V60/V70 2000--2006
Full OM639 1.5d Report Full 6G74 Report