BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D vs 6G75

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
6G75 ACCEPTABLE 72/100
+12 points over BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D
0 / 100
CAUTION BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D Mitsubishi
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 6G75 Mitsubishi

Specifications

BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D
6G75
Brand
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Verdict
CAUTION
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
60
72
Years
2007--2012
2006--2020
Displacement
1968 cc
3828 cc
Layout
I4
V6
Type
Diesel
Petrol Na
Power
136--140 hp
250 hp
Known Issues
2
1
Total Risk Cost
€1,300--€3,200
€400--€800

Character

BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D

"Outlander/ASX. VW PD (pump-düse) engine sourced for Mitsubishi. Same PD injector issues. DMF. DPF. Camshaft wear on PD engines. Not well-suited for Mitsubishi application."

6G75

"Pajero/Outlander. MIVEC variable timing. Timing belt (interference). Last big Mitsubishi V6. Oil consumption. Smooth power delivery. Reliable with belt maintenance."

Issues Comparison

BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D 2

▲ HIGH
DMF failure €500--€1,200 80,000 km--150,000 km
▲ HIGH
Camshaft wear (PD engine) €800--€2,000 80,000 km--150,000 km

6G75 1

▲ HIGH
Timing belt (interference) €400--€800 60,000 km--90,000 km

Models

BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D 4

Grandis NA 2005--2011 Outlander CU 2006--2006 Lancer CS 2006--2007 Lancer CY/CZ 2008--2013

6G75 1

Pajero V80/V90 2006--2013
Full BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D Report Full 6G75 Report