BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D vs 4G13

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
4G13 BUY 78/100
+18 points over BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D
0 / 100
CAUTION BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D Mitsubishi
0 / 100
BUY 4G13 Mitsubishi

Specifications

BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D
4G13
Brand
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Verdict
CAUTION
BUY
Reliability
60
78
Years
2007--2012
1996--2008
Displacement
1968 cc
1298 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Diesel
Petrol Na
Power
136--140 hp
75--82 hp
Known Issues
2
1
Total Risk Cost
€1,300--€3,200
€200--€400

Character

BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D

"Outlander/ASX. VW PD (pump-düse) engine sourced for Mitsubishi. Same PD injector issues. DMF. DPF. Camshaft wear on PD engines. Not well-suited for Mitsubishi application."

4G13

"Colt/Lancer. Simple OHC. Timing belt. Reliable city car engine. Low maintenance. Oil consumption at high mileage. Nothing exciting but dependable."

Issues Comparison

BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D 2

▲ HIGH
DMF failure €500--€1,200 80,000 km--150,000 km
▲ HIGH
Camshaft wear (PD engine) €800--€2,000 80,000 km--150,000 km

4G13 1

▲ HIGH
Timing belt (interference) €200--€400 60,000 km--90,000 km

Models

BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D 4

Grandis NA 2005--2011 Outlander CU 2006--2006 Lancer CS 2006--2007 Lancer CY/CZ 2008--2013

4G13 1

Lancer CS 2000--2007
Full BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D Report Full 4G13 Report