BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D vs 4B12

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
4B12 ACCEPTABLE 72/100
+12 points over BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D
0 / 100
CAUTION BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D Mitsubishi
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 4B12 Mitsubishi

Specifications

BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D
4B12
Brand
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Verdict
CAUTION
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
60
72
Years
2007--2012
2007--2020
Displacement
1968 cc
2360 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Diesel
Petrol Na
Power
136--140 hp
168--170 hp
Known Issues
2
1
Total Risk Cost
€1,300--€3,200
€400--€800

Character

BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D

"Outlander/ASX. VW PD (pump-düse) engine sourced for Mitsubishi. Same PD injector issues. DMF. DPF. Camshaft wear on PD engines. Not well-suited for Mitsubishi application."

4B12

"Outlander/ASX 2.4. Bigger bore 4B11. Adequate SUV power. Chain-driven. No major issues known."

Issues Comparison

BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D 2

▲ HIGH
DMF failure €500--€1,200 80,000 km--150,000 km
▲ HIGH
Camshaft wear (PD engine) €800--€2,000 80,000 km--150,000 km

4B12 1

○ MINOR
Timing chain €400--€800 150,000 km--∞

Models

BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D 4

Grandis NA 2005--2011 Outlander CU 2006--2006 Lancer CS 2006--2007 Lancer CY/CZ 2008--2013

4B12 3

Galant EA 1997--2004 Outlander GF/GG 2013--2021 Outlander 2.4 MIVEC GF 2012--2021 SUV
Full BSY/BWC 2.0 DI-D Report Full 4B12 Report