4D68T vs 6G74

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
6G74 ACCEPTABLE 72/100
+2 points over 4D68T
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 4D68T Mitsubishi
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 6G74 Mitsubishi

Specifications

4D68T
6G74
Brand
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
70
72
Years
1995--2003
1997--2006
Displacement
1998 cc
3497 cc
Layout
I4
V6
Type
Diesel
Petrol Na
Power
90 hp
203 hp
Known Issues
1
1
Total Risk Cost
€200--€400
€300--€800

Character

4D68T

"Space Star/Carisma. Old indirect injection diesel. Timing belt. Simple. No common rail complexity. Economical. Glow plug failures. Adequate for the era."

6G74

"Pajero. GDI direct injection on later variants (problematic). NA MPFI version more reliable. Timing belt. Oil consumption. Adequate torque for Pajero."

Issues Comparison

4D68T 1

▲ HIGH
Timing belt €200--€400 60,000 km--90,000 km

6G74 1

● MODERATE
GDI carbon buildup (DI variants) €300--€800 60,000 km--120,000 km

Models

4D68T 1

Galant EA 1997--2000

6G74 1

Pajero V60/V70 2000--2006
Full 4D68T Report Full 6G74 Report