SkyActiv-G 1.5 vs PE-VPS 2.0

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
PE-VPS 2.0 BEST 85/100
+1 points over SkyActiv-G 1.5
0 / 100
BUY SkyActiv-G 1.5 Mazda
0 / 100
BEST PE-VPS 2.0 Mazda

Specifications

SkyActiv-G 1.5
PE-VPS 2.0
Brand
Mazda
Mazda
Verdict
BUY
BEST
Reliability
84
85
Years
2013--present
2012--2019
Displacement
1496 cc
1998 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Petrol Na
Petrol Na
Power
75--131 hp
150--165 hp
Known Issues
1
0
Total Risk Cost
€0--€300
€0--€0

Character

SkyActiv-G 1.5

"Mazda2/3/CX-3. High compression (14:1). Chain driven. Excellent fuel economy. No known major issues. Carbon buildup less than DI-only engines due to port injection."

PE-VPS 2.0

"Pre-Skyactiv-X Mazda3/CX-5. Simple, proven. No issues. Good baseline Mazda engine."

Issues Comparison

SkyActiv-G 1.5 1

○ MINOR
Carbon buildup (minimal) €0--€300 100,000 km--200,000 km

PE-VPS 2.0 0

No documented issues.

Models

SkyActiv-G 1.5 6

2 DJ/DL 2014--present 2 DJ/DL 2014--present 3 BM/BN 2013--2019 MX-5 ND 2015--present CX-3 DK 2015--2024 2 DJ/DL 2018--present

PE-VPS 2.0 37

RX-8 SE3P 2003--2012 RX-8 SE3P 2003--2012 MX-5 NA 1989--1998 MX-5 NB 1998--2005 MX-5 NA 1989--1998 MX-5 NA 1994--1998 MX-5 NB 1998--2005 626 GF/GW 1997--2002 5 CR 2005--2010 MX-5 NC 2005--2015 6 GG/GY 2002--2008 5 CW 2010--2018 6 GH 2008--2012 6 GG/GY 2002--2008 5 CR 2005--2010 3 BK 2003--2009 MX-5 NC 2005--2015 5 CW 2010--2015 6 GH 2008--2012 3 BL 2009--2013 MX-5 ND 2019--present MX-5 ND 2019--present 3 BM/BN 2013--2019 CX-5 KF 2017--present CX-3 DK 2015--2024 CX-30 DM 2019--present CX-3 DK 2015--2024 6 GJ/GL 2012--2023 3 BM/BN 2013--2019 3 BP 2019--present MX-5 ND 2015--2019 6 GJ/GL 2012--2023 CX-5 KE 2012--2017 CX-30 DM 2022--present 3 BK 2003--2009 3 BL 2009--2013 2 DE/DH 2007--2014
Full SkyActiv-G 1.5 Report Full PE-VPS 2.0 Report