PE-VPS 2.0 vs Skyactiv-G 2.0
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
Skyactiv-G 2.0
BEST
88/100
+3 points over PE-VPS 2.0
0
/ 100
BEST
PE-VPS 2.0
Mazda
0
/ 100
BEST
Skyactiv-G 2.0
Mazda
Specifications
PE-VPS 2.0
Skyactiv-G 2.0
Brand
Mazda
Mazda
Verdict
BEST
BEST
Reliability
85
88
Years
2012--2019
2012--present
Displacement
1998 cc
1998 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Petrol Na
Petrol Na
Power
150--165 hp
120--165 hp
Known Issues
0
2
Total Risk Cost
€0--€0
€380--€800
Character
PE-VPS 2.0
"Pre-Skyactiv-X Mazda3/CX-5. Simple, proven. No issues. Good baseline Mazda engine."
Skyactiv-G 2.0
"Mazda3/CX-30/CX-5. High compression (13:1). No turbo = no turbo problems. Smooth, efficient, extremely reliable."
Issues Comparison
PE-VPS 2.0 0
No documented issues.
Skyactiv-G 2.0 2
○ MINOR
MAF sensor fault codes
○ MINOR
Carbon buildup (DI — only real concern)