Theta II 2.4 MPI (G4KE) vs U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
BUY
80/100
+25 points over Theta II 2.4 MPI (G4KE)
0
/ 100
CAUTION
Theta II 2.4 MPI (G4KE)
Hyundai/Kia
0
/ 100
BUY
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
Hyundai/Kia
Specifications
Theta II 2.4 MPI (G4KE)
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
Brand
Hyundai/Kia
Hyundai/Kia
Verdict
CAUTION
BUY
Reliability
55
80
Years
2009--2020
2008--2020
Displacement
2359 cc
1582 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Petrol Na
Diesel
Power
175--188 hp
110--136 hp
Known Issues
1
2
Total Risk Cost
€5,000--€20,000
€700--€1,900
Character
Theta II 2.4 MPI (G4KE)
"MPI version avoids some GDI carbon issues but shares Theta II platform. Less recall-prone than GDI. Still risky."
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
"Proven diesel. 300k+ km possible. EGR/DPF need highway use. Good for commuters."
Issues Comparison
Theta II 2.4 MPI (G4KE) 1
◆ CRITICAL
Rod bearing failure (same settlement as GDI)
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB) 2
▲ HIGH
DPF blockage — city use
● MODERATE
EGR valve fouling
Models
Theta II 2.4 MPI (G4KE) 0
No models listed.
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB) 50
Getz
i20
i20
Rio
Picanto
i30
Ceed
Sportage
Santa Fe
Tucson
Sportage
Cerato
Tucson
Sportage
Santa Fe
Sportage
Cerato
i30
Cerato
Ceed
Ceed
Ceed
Ceed
i30
Ceed
Venga
Ceed
Soul
XCeed
i30
Ceed
Stonic
i30
i30
Cerato
XCeed
Ceed
i30
i20
Soul
i20
Ceed
i30
i20
Rio
Venga
Rio
Kona 1.6 CRDi
Sportage 1.6 CRDi
Tucson 1.6 CRDi