Theta II 2.4 MPI (G4KE) vs U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
BUY
80/100
+25 points over Theta II 2.4 MPI (G4KE)
0
/ 100
CAUTION
Theta II 2.4 MPI (G4KE)
Hyundai/Kia
0
/ 100
BUY
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
Hyundai/Kia
Specifications
Theta II 2.4 MPI (G4KE)
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
Brand
Hyundai/Kia
Hyundai/Kia
Verdict
CAUTION
BUY
Reliability
55
80
Years
2009--2020
2008--2020
Displacement
2359 cc
1582 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Petrol Na
Diesel
Power
175--188 hp
110--136 hp
Known Issues
1
2
Total Risk Cost
€5,000--€20,000
€700--€1,900
Character
Theta II 2.4 MPI (G4KE)
"MPI version avoids some GDI carbon issues but shares Theta II platform. Less recall-prone than GDI. Still risky."
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
"Proven diesel. 300k+ km possible. EGR/DPF need highway use. Good for commuters."
Issues Comparison
Theta II 2.4 MPI (G4KE) 1
◆ CRITICAL
Rod bearing failure (same settlement as GDI)
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB) 2
▲ HIGH
DPF blockage — city use
● MODERATE
EGR valve fouling
Models
Theta II 2.4 MPI (G4KE) 0
No models listed.
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB) 50
Getz
i20
Rio
i20
Picanto
Tucson
Ceed
Santa Fe
Cerato
Santa Fe
Sportage
Sportage
Tucson
Sportage
Sportage
i30
Cerato
Stonic
XCeed
Ceed
Ceed
i30
Ceed
Soul
Ceed
i20
Cerato
Soul
i30
Venga
i30
Ceed
XCeed
i30
Ceed
i30
Ceed
i30
Cerato
Ceed
Venga
Rio
i20
Ceed
Rio
i30
i20
Kona 1.6 CRDi
Sportage 1.6 CRDi
Tucson 1.6 CRDi