2.5 FHEV/PHEV vs EcoBoost 2.0

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
EcoBoost 2.0 ACCEPTABLE 76/100
+4 points over 2.5 FHEV/PHEV
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 2.5 FHEV/PHEV Ford
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE EcoBoost 2.0 Ford

Specifications

2.5 FHEV/PHEV
EcoBoost 2.0
Brand
Ford
Ford
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
72
76
Years
2020--present
2010--present
Displacement
2488 cc
1999 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Hybrid
Petrol Turbo
Power
190--225 hp
200--250 hp
Known Issues
1
0
Total Risk Cost
€1,000--€5,000
€0--€0

Character

2.5 FHEV/PHEV

"Kuga/Galaxy/S-MAX FHEV/PHEV. Toyota-style Atkinson cycle. CVT. PHEV battery concerns at high mileage. Engine itself is Mazda-Ford co-developed. Reliable hybrid system."

EcoBoost 2.0

"Focus ST/Mondeo/Kuga. Strong, tunable. Head gasket concern on early Focus ST. Good overall."

Issues Comparison

2.5 FHEV/PHEV 1

● MODERATE
PHEV battery degradation €1,000--€5,000 60,000 km--150,000 km

EcoBoost 2.0 0

No documented issues.

Models

2.5 FHEV/PHEV 4

Galaxy Mk3 (CD390) 2020--2023 Kuga Mk3 2020--present S-Max Mk2 (CD390) 2020--2023 Kuga Mk3 2020--present

EcoBoost 2.0 13

Focus Mk1 (DAW) 2002--2004 Mondeo Mk4 (BA7) 2007--2014 Focus Mk1 (DAW) 2002--2003 Focus Mk3 (DYB) 2012--2018 Mondeo Mk4 (BA7) 2007--2014 Mondeo Mk4 (BA7) 2010--2014 Mondeo Mk5 (CD391) 2015--2022 Galaxy Mk3 (CD390) 2015--2023 S-Max Mk2 (CD390) 2015--2023 Mondeo Mk5 (CD391) 2015--2019 Mondeo Mk4 (BA7) 2010--2014 Focus ST 2.0 EcoBoost DYB 2012--2018 Hatchback Kuga 2.0 EcoBoost CBS 2012--2019 SUV
Full 2.5 FHEV/PHEV Report Full EcoBoost 2.0 Report