2.5 FHEV/PHEV vs Duratec 2.5

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
Duratec 2.5 BUY 82/100
+10 points over 2.5 FHEV/PHEV
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 2.5 FHEV/PHEV Ford
0 / 100
BUY Duratec 2.5 Ford

Specifications

2.5 FHEV/PHEV
Duratec 2.5
Brand
Ford
Ford
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
BUY
Reliability
72
82
Years
2020--present
2005--2014
Displacement
2488 cc
2521 cc
Layout
I4
I5
Type
Hybrid
Petrol Na
Power
190--225 hp
166--172 hp
Known Issues
1
1
Total Risk Cost
€1,000--€5,000
€150--€350

Character

2.5 FHEV/PHEV

"Kuga/Galaxy/S-MAX FHEV/PHEV. Toyota-style Atkinson cycle. CVT. PHEV battery concerns at high mileage. Engine itself is Mazda-Ford co-developed. Reliable hybrid system."

Duratec 2.5

"Focus ST (pre-EB)/Mondeo/S-Max. Volvo-derived 5-cyl. Smooth, adequate torque. Timing belt service needed."

Issues Comparison

2.5 FHEV/PHEV 1

● MODERATE
PHEV battery degradation €1,000--€5,000 60,000 km--150,000 km

Duratec 2.5 1

○ MINOR
Coolant system (same family as 2.0) €150--€350 100,000 km--180,000 km

Models

2.5 FHEV/PHEV 4

Galaxy Mk3 (CD390) 2020--2023 Kuga Mk3 2020--present S-Max Mk2 (CD390) 2020--2023 Kuga Mk3 2020--present

Duratec 2.5 4

Mondeo Mk4 (BA7) 2007--2010 Focus Mk2 (DA3) 2005--2011 Kuga Mk1 2008--2012 Mondeo Mk3 (B5Y) 2000--2007
Full 2.5 FHEV/PHEV Report Full Duratec 2.5 Report