EcoBoost 1.0 (post-2018) vs Duratec 2.0

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
Duratec 2.0 BEST 88/100
+16 points over EcoBoost 1.0 (post-2018)
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE EcoBoost 1.0 (post-2018) Ford
0 / 100
BEST Duratec 2.0 Ford

Specifications

EcoBoost 1.0 (post-2018)
Duratec 2.0
Brand
Ford
Ford
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
BEST
Reliability
72
88
Years
2018--present
2001--2018
Displacement
999 cc
1999 cc
Layout
I3
I4
Type
Petrol Turbo
Petrol Na
Power
100--155 hp
130--145 hp
Known Issues
2
2
Total Risk Cost
€650--€1,400
€550--€1,150

Character

EcoBoost 1.0 (post-2018)

"Coolant-into-cylinder issue resolved. Revised head gasket. Award-winning 3-cyl now actually reliable. Good city/commuter."

Duratec 2.0

"Focus/Mondeo/Mazda3 shared. Mazda MZR co-developed. Simple, proven, nearly bulletproof. 300k+ km. The reliable Ford."

Issues Comparison

EcoBoost 1.0 (post-2018) 2

○ MINOR
Carbon buildup (DI 3-cyl) €250--€500 80,000 km--150,000 km
○ MINOR
Timing chain (building data) €400--€900 100,000 km--160,000 km

Duratec 2.0 2

○ MINOR
Coolant system maintenance (age) €150--€350 100,000 km--180,000 km
○ MINOR
Timing chain (long life, minor at high mileage) €400--€800 150,000 km--∞

Models

EcoBoost 1.0 (post-2018) 1

Fiesta 1.0 EcoBoost JA8 LCI 2018--2022 Hatchback

Duratec 2.0 5

Mondeo Mk3 (B5Y) 2000--2007 Focus Mk1 (DAW) 1998--2004 Fiesta Mk6 (JD/JH) 2005--2008 Mondeo 2.0 Duratec B5Y 2000--2007 Sedan Mondeo 2.0 Duratec BA7 2007--2014 Sedan
Full EcoBoost 1.0 (post-2018) Report Full Duratec 2.0 Report