M62 vs M50/M52

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
M50/M52 BEST 95/100
+37 points over M62
0 / 100
CAUTION M62 BMW
0 / 100
BEST M50/M52 BMW

Specifications

M62
M50/M52
Brand
BMW
BMW
Verdict
CAUTION
BEST
Reliability
58
95
Years
1996--2003
1990--2000
Displacement
4398 cc
2494 cc
Layout
V8
I6
Type
Petrol Na
Petrol Na
Power
282--326 hp
150--170 hp
Known Issues
2
3
Total Risk Cost
€3,500--€9,500
€330--€850

Character

M62

"E39 540i/E38 740i V8. Alusil block, Nikasil issues on early units. VANOS failure, timing chain guides, valley pan gasket. Expensive to maintain but rewarding."

M50/M52

"Smooth, linear, bulletproof. Classic BMW feel. Simple maintenance. Cheap parts."

Issues Comparison

M62 2

◆ CRITICAL
Nikasil bore wear (early units) €3,000--€8,000 80,000 km--150,000 km
▲ HIGH
VANOS unit failure €500--€1,500 80,000 km--150,000 km

M50/M52 3

● MODERATE
Cooling system plastics (tank, housing, impeller) €150--€350 100,000 km--180,000 km
○ MINOR
VANOS oil seal wear (M52 only) €80--€200 120,000 km--200,000 km
○ MINOR
Valve cover / oil pan gasket leaks €100--€300 150,000 km--∞

Models

M62 2

X5 E53 2000--2003 5 Series E39 1996--2003

M50/M52 12

3 Series E36 1990--1994 3 Series E36 1990--1995 3 Series E36 1994--1999 5 Series E39 1996--2000 3 Series E46 1998--2001 5 Series E39 1996--2000 3 Series E36 1995--1999 3 Series E46 1998--2000 5 Series E39 1996--2000 Z3 E36/7 1997--2000 3 Series E36 1995--1999 3 Series E46 1998--2000
Full M62 Report Full M50/M52 Report