M160/M160E vs OM660 0.8 CDI
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
OM660 0.8 CDI
CAUTION
55/100
+15 points over M160/M160E
0
/ 100
AVOID
M160/M160E
Smart
0
/ 100
CAUTION
OM660 0.8 CDI
Smart
Specifications
M160/M160E
OM660 0.8 CDI
Brand
Smart
Smart
Verdict
AVOID
CAUTION
Reliability
40
55
Years
1998--2007
2000--2014
Displacement
599 cc
799 cc
Layout
I3
I3
Type
Petrol Turbo
Diesel
Power
45--61 hp
41--54 hp
Known Issues
5
2
Total Risk Cost
€2,200--€5,700
€700--€2,000
Character
M160/M160E
"Original Smart engine. Tiny, turbocharged, temperamental. Clutch actuator = wallet killer. Fun when it works."
OM660 0.8 CDI
"ForTwo 450/451. Smallest production diesel. Turbo failure on 54hp version. DPF on 451. EGR. Quirky but fragile. Specialist Smart workshops only."
Issues Comparison
M160/M160E 5
◆ CRITICAL
Clutch actuator failure
◆ CRITICAL
Head gasket failure
▲ HIGH
Overheating (rear-mount cooling)
▲ HIGH
Turbo failure
● MODERATE
ECU / immobilizer fault
OM660 0.8 CDI 2
▲ HIGH
DPF (451 model)
▲ HIGH
Turbo failure (54hp CDI)