OM660 0.8 CDI vs M132 (3B21)
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
OM660 0.8 CDI
CAUTION
55/100
+3 points over M132 (3B21)
0
/ 100
CAUTION
OM660 0.8 CDI
Smart
0
/ 100
CAUTION
M132 (3B21)
Smart
Specifications
OM660 0.8 CDI
M132 (3B21)
Brand
Smart
Smart
Verdict
CAUTION
CAUTION
Reliability
55
52
Years
2000--2014
2007--2014
Displacement
799 cc
999 cc
Layout
I3
I3
Type
Diesel
Petrol Turbo
Power
41--54 hp
61--84 hp
Known Issues
2
4
Total Risk Cost
€700--€2,000
€1,500--€4,000
Character
OM660 0.8 CDI
"ForTwo 450/451. Smallest production diesel. Turbo failure on 54hp version. DPF on 451. EGR. Quirky but fragile. Specialist Smart workshops only."
M132 (3B21)
"Mitsubishi 3B21 heart. Turbo version is peppy but fragile. SAM unit is the real villain. Budget carefully."
Issues Comparison
OM660 0.8 CDI 2
▲ HIGH
DPF (451 model)
▲ HIGH
Turbo failure (54hp CDI)
M132 (3B21) 4
◆ CRITICAL
SAM unit failure (electrical)
▲ HIGH
Clutch actuator wear (automated manual)
▲ HIGH
Turbo actuator failure
● MODERATE
Oil leak (valve cover / sump)