M135 1.3/1.5 vs M160/M160E
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
M135 1.3/1.5
ACCEPTABLE
72/100
+32 points over M160/M160E
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
M135 1.3/1.5
Smart
0
/ 100
AVOID
M160/M160E
Smart
Specifications
M135 1.3/1.5
M160/M160E
Brand
Smart
Smart
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
AVOID
Reliability
72
40
Years
2014--2019
1998--2007
Displacement
1332 cc
599 cc
Layout
I4
I3
Type
Petrol Na
Petrol Turbo
Power
71--109 hp
45--61 hp
Known Issues
2
5
Total Risk Cost
€300--€1,200
€2,200--€5,700
Character
M135 1.3/1.5
"ForTwo/ForFour 453. Mitsubishi 3A9 engine (Mirage/Space Star). NA 1.0 (71hp) and 1.3 (109hp). Brabus 1.5 turbo (177hp) rare. Simple, reliable for what it is. Timing chain. CVT on ForTwo can be jerky. Better than old M132."
M160/M160E
"Original Smart engine. Tiny, turbocharged, temperamental. Clutch actuator = wallet killer. Fun when it works."
Issues Comparison
M135 1.3/1.5 2
● MODERATE
CVT jerkiness (ForTwo)
● MODERATE
Timing chain tensioner wear
M160/M160E 5
◆ CRITICAL
Clutch actuator failure
◆ CRITICAL
Head gasket failure
▲ HIGH
Overheating (rear-mount cooling)
▲ HIGH
Turbo failure
● MODERATE
ECU / immobilizer fault