M132 (3B21) vs H4B (SCe 1.0)
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
H4B (SCe 1.0)
ACCEPTABLE
72/100
+20 points over M132 (3B21)
0
/ 100
CAUTION
M132 (3B21)
Smart
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
H4B (SCe 1.0)
Smart
Specifications
M132 (3B21)
H4B (SCe 1.0)
Brand
Smart
Smart
Verdict
CAUTION
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
52
72
Years
2007--2014
2014--present
Displacement
999 cc
999 cc
Layout
I3
I3
Type
Petrol Turbo
Petrol Na
Power
61--84 hp
71 hp
Known Issues
4
3
Total Risk Cost
€1,500--€4,000
€450--€1,150
Character
M132 (3B21)
"Mitsubishi 3B21 heart. Turbo version is peppy but fragile. SAM unit is the real villain. Budget carefully."
H4B (SCe 1.0)
"Renault H4B in a Smart box. Slow but honest. Simple 3-cyl, no turbo drama. Perfect city runabout."
Issues Comparison
M132 (3B21) 4
◆ CRITICAL
SAM unit failure (electrical)
▲ HIGH
Clutch actuator wear (automated manual)
▲ HIGH
Turbo actuator failure
● MODERATE
Oil leak (valve cover / sump)
H4B (SCe 1.0) 3
● MODERATE
Thermostat failure
○ MINOR
Ignition coil failure
○ MINOR
Engine mount vibration