M132 (3B21) vs OM660 0.8 CDI
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
OM660 0.8 CDI
CAUTION
55/100
+3 points over M132 (3B21)
0
/ 100
CAUTION
M132 (3B21)
Smart
0
/ 100
CAUTION
OM660 0.8 CDI
Smart
Specifications
M132 (3B21)
OM660 0.8 CDI
Brand
Smart
Smart
Verdict
CAUTION
CAUTION
Reliability
52
55
Years
2007--2014
2000--2014
Displacement
999 cc
799 cc
Layout
I3
I3
Type
Petrol Turbo
Diesel
Power
61--84 hp
41--54 hp
Known Issues
4
2
Total Risk Cost
€1,500--€4,000
€700--€2,000
Character
M132 (3B21)
"Mitsubishi 3B21 heart. Turbo version is peppy but fragile. SAM unit is the real villain. Budget carefully."
OM660 0.8 CDI
"ForTwo 450/451. Smallest production diesel. Turbo failure on 54hp version. DPF on 451. EGR. Quirky but fragile. Specialist Smart workshops only."
Issues Comparison
M132 (3B21) 4
◆ CRITICAL
SAM unit failure (electrical)
▲ HIGH
Clutch actuator wear (automated manual)
▲ HIGH
Turbo actuator failure
● MODERATE
Oil leak (valve cover / sump)
OM660 0.8 CDI 2
▲ HIGH
DPF (451 model)
▲ HIGH
Turbo failure (54hp CDI)