M132 (3B21) vs M135 1.3/1.5
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
M135 1.3/1.5
ACCEPTABLE
72/100
+20 points over M132 (3B21)
0
/ 100
CAUTION
M132 (3B21)
Smart
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
M135 1.3/1.5
Smart
Specifications
M132 (3B21)
M135 1.3/1.5
Brand
Smart
Smart
Verdict
CAUTION
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
52
72
Years
2007--2014
2014--2019
Displacement
999 cc
1332 cc
Layout
I3
I4
Type
Petrol Turbo
Petrol Na
Power
61--84 hp
71--109 hp
Known Issues
4
2
Total Risk Cost
€1,500--€4,000
€300--€1,200
Character
M132 (3B21)
"Mitsubishi 3B21 heart. Turbo version is peppy but fragile. SAM unit is the real villain. Budget carefully."
M135 1.3/1.5
"ForTwo/ForFour 453. Mitsubishi 3A9 engine (Mirage/Space Star). NA 1.0 (71hp) and 1.3 (109hp). Brabus 1.5 turbo (177hp) rare. Simple, reliable for what it is. Timing chain. CVT on ForTwo can be jerky. Better than old M132."
Issues Comparison
M132 (3B21) 4
◆ CRITICAL
SAM unit failure (electrical)
▲ HIGH
Clutch actuator wear (automated manual)
▲ HIGH
Turbo actuator failure
● MODERATE
Oil leak (valve cover / sump)
M135 1.3/1.5 2
● MODERATE
CVT jerkiness (ForTwo)
● MODERATE
Timing chain tensioner wear