TCe 1.2 (H5F) vs K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
BUY
78/100
+16 points over TCe 1.2 (H5F)
0
/ 100
CAUTION
TCe 1.2 (H5F)
Renault
0
/ 100
BUY
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Renault
Specifications
TCe 1.2 (H5F)
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Brand
Renault
Renault
Verdict
CAUTION
BUY
Reliability
62
78
Years
2012--2019
2010--2020
Displacement
1197 cc
1461 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Petrol Turbo
Diesel
Power
115--130 hp
75--110 hp
Known Issues
3
3
Total Risk Cost
€1,900--€5,000
€1,300--€3,100
Character
TCe 1.2 (H5F)
"Megane/Kadjar. Oil consumption issues reported. Timing chain can stretch. Mixed reviews."
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
"Revised K9K. Improved turbo and injectors. Still Europes most common small diesel. Proven long-distance."
Issues Comparison
TCe 1.2 (H5F) 3
▲ HIGH
Oil consumption — piston rings
▲ HIGH
Timing chain stretch
● MODERATE
Thermostat failure
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010) 3
▲ HIGH
Timing belt — INTERFERENCE ENGINE (critical)
● MODERATE
EGR fouling + DPF (city use)
● MODERATE
Turbocharger wear at high mileage
Models
TCe 1.2 (H5F) 57
Kadjar
Kadjar
Clio
Scenic
Scenic
Lodgy
Megane
Duster
Megane
Megane
Scenic
Scenic
Captur
Kangoo
Dokker
Duster
Austral
Duster
Austral
Austral
Rafale
Espace
Rafale
Captur
Jogger
Symbioz
Clio
ASX
Arkana
Clio
Modus
Megane
Megane
Wind
Kangoo
Modus
Kangoo
Clio
Scenic
Fluence
Laguna
Duster
Laguna
Kangoo
Laguna
Scenic
Clio
Laguna
Logan
Laguna
Twingo
Clio
Kangoo
Lodgy
Megane
Clio 1.2 TCe
Megane 1.2 TCe