TCe 1.2 (H5F) vs K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
BUY
78/100
+16 points over TCe 1.2 (H5F)
0
/ 100
CAUTION
TCe 1.2 (H5F)
Renault
0
/ 100
BUY
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Renault
Specifications
TCe 1.2 (H5F)
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Brand
Renault
Renault
Verdict
CAUTION
BUY
Reliability
62
78
Years
2012--2019
2010--2020
Displacement
1197 cc
1461 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Petrol Turbo
Diesel
Power
115--130 hp
75--110 hp
Known Issues
3
3
Total Risk Cost
€1,900--€5,000
€1,300--€3,100
Character
TCe 1.2 (H5F)
"Megane/Kadjar. Oil consumption issues reported. Timing chain can stretch. Mixed reviews."
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
"Revised K9K. Improved turbo and injectors. Still Europes most common small diesel. Proven long-distance."
Issues Comparison
TCe 1.2 (H5F) 3
▲ HIGH
Oil consumption — piston rings
▲ HIGH
Timing chain stretch
● MODERATE
Thermostat failure
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010) 3
▲ HIGH
Timing belt — INTERFERENCE ENGINE (critical)
● MODERATE
EGR fouling + DPF (city use)
● MODERATE
Turbocharger wear at high mileage
Models
TCe 1.2 (H5F) 57
Captur
Scenic
Scenic
Clio
Kadjar
Kangoo
Dokker
Megane
Scenic
Duster
Lodgy
Megane
Scenic
Kadjar
Megane
Duster
Austral
Duster
Austral
Austral
Espace
Rafale
Rafale
Symbioz
Jogger
Arkana
Captur
ASX
Clio
Scenic
Clio
Modus
Fluence
Clio
Modus
Kangoo
Laguna
Twingo
Lodgy
Megane
Laguna
Duster
Kangoo
Clio
Kangoo
Kangoo
Wind
Laguna
Laguna
Logan
Laguna
Clio
Scenic
Megane
Megane
Clio 1.2 TCe
Megane 1.2 TCe