H4D vs K7J/K7M

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
K7J/K7M BUY 82/100
+10 points over H4D
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE H4D Renault
0 / 100
BUY K7J/K7M Renault

Specifications

H4D
K7J/K7M
Brand
Renault
Renault
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
BUY
Reliability
72
82
Years
2019--present
1995--2015
Displacement
999 cc
1598 cc
Layout
I3
I4
Type
Petrol Na
Petrol Na
Power
65 hp
75--90 hp
Known Issues
1
1
Total Risk Cost
€0--€0
€200--€400

Character

H4D

"Clio V/Sandero III base engine. 3-cylinder NA. Simple, fuel efficient. Too new for long-term data. No known major issues yet."

K7J/K7M

"Clio/Logan/Sandero. Simplest Renault engine. 8-valve, timing belt. Nearly unbreakable with basic maintenance. Dacia fleet favourite. Low power, high durability."

Issues Comparison

H4D 1

○ MINOR
No significant issues known yet €0--€0 0 km--0 km

K7J/K7M 1

● MODERATE
Timing belt replacement €200--€400 60,000 km--90,000 km

Models

H4D 0

No models listed.

K7J/K7M 9

Kangoo I (KC) 1998--2007 Logan L90 2004--2012 Sandero B90 2008--2012 Sandero B90 2008--2012 Lodgy — 2012--2016 Logan L90 2004--2012 Dokker — 2012--2020 Dokker — 2013--2020 Logan MCV KS0 2006--2012
Full H4D Report Full K7J/K7M Report