H4D vs D4F

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
D4F BUY 80/100
+8 points over H4D
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE H4D Renault
0 / 100
BUY D4F Renault

Specifications

H4D
D4F
Brand
Renault
Renault
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
BUY
Reliability
72
80
Years
2019--present
1996--2015
Displacement
999 cc
1149 cc
Layout
I3
I4
Type
Petrol Na
Petrol Na
Power
65 hp
60--75 hp
Known Issues
1
1
Total Risk Cost
€0--€0
€100--€300

Character

H4D

"Clio V/Sandero III base engine. 3-cylinder NA. Simple, fuel efficient. Too new for long-term data. No known major issues yet."

D4F

"Clio/Twingo/Modus. Tiny but tough. Timing chain on D4F (good). Throttle body failure. Idle issues. Simple and cheap. Perfect city car engine."

Issues Comparison

H4D 1

○ MINOR
No significant issues known yet €0--€0 0 km--0 km

D4F 1

● MODERATE
Throttle body failure €100--€300 60,000 km--120,000 km

Models

H4D 0

No models listed.

D4F 12

Rio JB 2005--2011 Rio DC 2002--2005 Twingo I (C06) 1993--2007 Kangoo I (KC) 1998--2007 Clio II (B/CB0) 1998--2005 Clio I (B/C57) 1991--1998 Twingo II (CN0) 2007--2014 Kangoo I (KC) 1998--2007 Twingo I (C06) 1993--2007 Twingo II (CN0) 2007--2014 Clio II (B/CB0) 1998--2005 Clio I (B/C57) 1991--1998
Full H4D Report Full D4F Report