F9Q vs K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
BUY
78/100
+8 points over F9Q
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
F9Q
Renault
0
/ 100
BUY
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Renault
Specifications
F9Q
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Brand
Renault
Renault
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
BUY
Reliability
70
78
Years
1997--2010
2010--2020
Displacement
1870 cc
1461 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Diesel
Diesel
Power
80--130 hp
75--110 hp
Known Issues
1
3
Total Risk Cost
€300--€600
€1,300--€3,100
Character
F9Q
"Megane/Scenic/Laguna diesel. Timing belt (interference). Pre-common-rail versions very simple. Common rail versions have injector issues. Turbo reliable. Good economy."
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
"Revised K9K. Improved turbo and injectors. Still Europes most common small diesel. Proven long-distance."
Issues Comparison
F9Q 1
▲ HIGH
Timing belt (interference engine)
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010) 3
▲ HIGH
Timing belt — INTERFERENCE ENGINE (critical)
● MODERATE
EGR fouling + DPF (city use)
● MODERATE
Turbocharger wear at high mileage