F4R vs K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
BUY
78/100
+6 points over F4R
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
F4R
Renault
0
/ 100
BUY
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Renault
Specifications
F4R
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Brand
Renault
Renault
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
BUY
Reliability
72
78
Years
1998--2017
2010--2020
Displacement
1998 cc
1461 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Petrol Na
Diesel
Power
135--140 hp
75--110 hp
Known Issues
1
3
Total Risk Cost
€300--€700
€1,300--€3,100
Character
F4R
"Megane/Scenic/Laguna. Timing belt (interference). Phase variator can fail. Oil consumption at high mileage. Turbo version (F4R-T) in Megane RS is different engine."
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
"Revised K9K. Improved turbo and injectors. Still Europes most common small diesel. Proven long-distance."
Issues Comparison
F4R 1
● MODERATE
Phase variator failure
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010) 3
▲ HIGH
Timing belt — INTERFERENCE ENGINE (critical)
● MODERATE
EGR fouling + DPF (city use)
● MODERATE
Turbocharger wear at high mileage