PureTech 1.2T (pre-2023) vs XU10 2.0
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
XU10 2.0
ACCEPTABLE
74/100
+34 points over PureTech 1.2T (pre-2023)
0
/ 100
AVOID
PureTech 1.2T (pre-2023)
PSA
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
XU10 2.0
PSA
Specifications
PureTech 1.2T (pre-2023)
XU10 2.0
Brand
PSA
PSA
Verdict
AVOID
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
40
74
Years
2014--2023
1992--2002
Displacement
1199 cc
1998 cc
Layout
I3
I4
Type
Petrol Turbo
Petrol Na
Power
110--155 hp
132--167 hp
Known Issues
2
1
Total Risk Cost
€3,000--€9,000
€250--€500
Character
PureTech 1.2T (pre-2023)
"Wet timing belt stretches and snaps. Oil consumption. Class-action. Engine of the Year but unreliable. Check belt urgently."
XU10 2.0
"405/406/Xantia. Older XU family — cast iron block. Turbo 16V version (RFS) in 405 T16. Timing belt. Head gasket on turbo variants. Simple, proven, cheap parts. RFS turbo is a classic."
Issues Comparison
PureTech 1.2T (pre-2023) 2
◆ CRITICAL
Wet timing belt disintegration — catastrophic
▲ HIGH
Oil consumption via belt wear particles
XU10 2.0 1
▲ HIGH
Timing belt (interference)
Models
PureTech 1.2T (pre-2023) 16
2008 1.2 PureTech
208 1.2 PureTech
3008 1.2 PureTech
308 1.2 PureTech
5008 1.2 PureTech
Astra 1.2 PureTech
Avenger 1.2 PureTech
Berlingo 1.2 PureTech
C3 1.2 PureTech
C4 1.2 PureTech
C4 Cactus 1.2 PureTech
C5 Aircross 1.2 PureTech
Corsa 1.2 PureTech
DS3 1.2 PureTech
Grandland 1.2 PureTech
Mokka 1.2 PureTech