DW10 HDi/BlueHDi vs XU10 2.0

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
XU10 2.0 ACCEPTABLE 74/100
+4 points over DW10 HDi/BlueHDi
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE DW10 HDi/BlueHDi PSA
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE XU10 2.0 PSA

Specifications

DW10 HDi/BlueHDi
XU10 2.0
Brand
PSA
PSA
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
70
74
Years
1999--2021
1992--2002
Displacement
1997 cc
1998 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Diesel
Petrol Na
Power
90--180 hp
132--167 hp
Known Issues
2
1
Total Risk Cost
€900--€2,400
€250--€500

Character

DW10 HDi/BlueHDi

"406/407/508/3008/C5. Workhorse diesel. Dual-mass flywheel. Injectors on high-mileage units. DPF on post-2006. Turbo actuator. Well-understood engine with good specialist support."

XU10 2.0

"405/406/Xantia. Older XU family — cast iron block. Turbo 16V version (RFS) in 405 T16. Timing belt. Head gasket on turbo variants. Simple, proven, cheap parts. RFS turbo is a classic."

Issues Comparison

DW10 HDi/BlueHDi 2

▲ HIGH
Dual-mass flywheel €500--€1,200 80,000 km--150,000 km
▲ HIGH
Injector failure at high mileage €400--€1,200 120,000 km--200,000 km

XU10 2.0 1

▲ HIGH
Timing belt (interference) €250--€500 60,000 km--90,000 km

Models

DW10 HDi/BlueHDi 1

Grand Vitara FT/GT 2001--2005

XU10 2.0 5

206 T1 1999--2007 206 2A/C 1999--2006 406 — 1996--2004 306 N3/N5 1993--2002 306 N3/N5 1994--2002
Full DW10 HDi/BlueHDi Report Full XU10 2.0 Report