DV6ATED4/DV6TED4 1.6 HDi 16v vs XU10 2.0
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
XU10 2.0
ACCEPTABLE
74/100
+15 points over DV6ATED4/DV6TED4 1.6 HDi 16v
0
/ 100
CAUTION
DV6ATED4/DV6TED4 1.6 HDi 16v
PSA
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
XU10 2.0
PSA
Specifications
DV6ATED4/DV6TED4 1.6 HDi 16v
XU10 2.0
Brand
PSA
PSA
Verdict
CAUTION
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
59
74
Years
2004--2010
1992--2002
Displacement
1560 cc
1998 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Diesel
Petrol Na
Power
75--110 hp
132--167 hp
Known Issues
3
1
Total Risk Cost
€400--€1,200
€250--€500
Character
DV6ATED4/DV6TED4 1.6 HDi 16v
"First-generation 16-valve 1.6 HDi (also Ford 1.6 TDCi, Volvo D4164T, Mini One D). Carbon in the oil blocks the turbo feed pipe and pickup strainer and kills the turbo — even dealer-serviced engines have done it twice. Leaking injector seals start the chain. Buy only with proof of short oil intervals and a turbo done with new feed pipes."
XU10 2.0
"405/406/Xantia. Older XU family — cast iron block. Turbo 16V version (RFS) in 405 T16. Timing belt. Head gasket on turbo variants. Simple, proven, cheap parts. RFS turbo is a classic."
Issues Comparison
DV6ATED4/DV6TED4 1.6 HDi 16v 3
▲ HIGH
DPF blockage — city driving
▲ HIGH
Injector copper-seal leak — soot into the oil ("black death")
▲ HIGH
Turbo failure from carbon-blocked oil feed and pickup strainer
XU10 2.0 1
▲ HIGH
Timing belt (interference)