1.3 JTD vs XU10 2.0

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
XU10 2.0 ACCEPTABLE 74/100
+2 points over 1.3 JTD
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 1.3 JTD PSA
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE XU10 2.0 PSA

Specifications

1.3 JTD
XU10 2.0
Brand
PSA
PSA
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
72
74
Years
2008--2017
1992--2002
Displacement
1248 cc
1998 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Diesel
Petrol Na
Power
75 hp
132--167 hp
Known Issues
1
1
Total Risk Cost
€400--€800
€250--€500

Character

1.3 JTD

"Nemo/Bipper. Fiat 1.3 MultiJet sourced. Same engine as fiat_13mjt. Timing chain. Swirl flap concerns at high mileage. Economical van engine."

XU10 2.0

"405/406/Xantia. Older XU family — cast iron block. Turbo 16V version (RFS) in 405 T16. Timing belt. Head gasket on turbo variants. Simple, proven, cheap parts. RFS turbo is a classic."

Issues Comparison

1.3 JTD 1

● MODERATE
Timing chain stretch €400--€800 120,000 km--200,000 km

XU10 2.0 1

▲ HIGH
Timing belt (interference) €250--€500 60,000 km--90,000 km

Models

1.3 JTD 1

Bipper A9 2010--2017

XU10 2.0 5

206 T1 1999--2007 206 2A/C 1999--2006 406 — 1996--2004 306 N3/N5 1993--2002 306 N3/N5 1994--2002
Full 1.3 JTD Report Full XU10 2.0 Report