A28NET 2.8T V6 vs 1.2 NA (Z12XEP)
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
1.2 NA (Z12XEP)
ACCEPTABLE
76/100
+14 points over A28NET 2.8T V6
0
/ 100
CAUTION
A28NET 2.8T V6
Opel
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
1.2 NA (Z12XEP)
Opel
Specifications
A28NET 2.8T V6
1.2 NA (Z12XEP)
Brand
Opel
Opel
Verdict
CAUTION
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
62
76
Years
2008--2017
2000--2014
Displacement
2792 cc
1229 cc
Layout
V6
I4
Type
Petrol Turbo
Petrol Na
Power
325 hp
80 hp
Known Issues
2
5
Total Risk Cost
€2,300--€6,000
€590--€1,480
Character
A28NET 2.8T V6
"Insignia OPC. Same GM HFV6 turbo as Saab 2.8T. Timing chain stretch notorious (chain at rear of engine). Turbo failure. Oil consumption. Expensive to maintain. Great power but fragile long-term."
1.2 NA (Z12XEP)
"Greek city car workhorse. Simple, cheap, 200k+ km proven. Chain tensioner is the one known weakness. Bulletproof otherwise."
Issues Comparison
A28NET 2.8T V6 2
◆ CRITICAL
Timing chain stretch (rear)
▲ HIGH
Turbo failure
1.2 NA (Z12XEP) 5
● MODERATE
Timing chain tensioner wear
○ MINOR
Ignition coil pack degradation
○ MINOR
Thermostat failure
○ MINOR
Water pump wear
○ MINOR
Valve cover gasket seep