Z20NET 2.0T vs 1.2 NA (Z12XEP)

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
1.2 NA (Z12XEP) ACCEPTABLE 76/100
+8 points over Z20NET 2.0T
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE Z20NET 2.0T Opel
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 1.2 NA (Z12XEP) Opel

Specifications

Z20NET 2.0T
1.2 NA (Z12XEP)
Brand
Opel
Opel
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
68
76
Years
2003--2008
2000--2014
Displacement
1998 cc
1229 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Petrol Turbo
Petrol Na
Power
175 hp
80 hp
Known Issues
1
5
Total Risk Cost
€200--€600
€590--€1,480

Character

Z20NET 2.0T

"Vectra C/Signum. GM Ecotec turbo (sedan variant). Less stressed than OPC versions. Turbo actuator wear. Oil leaks. Generally reliable for a mid-2000s turbo."

1.2 NA (Z12XEP)

"Greek city car workhorse. Simple, cheap, 200k+ km proven. Chain tensioner is the one known weakness. Bulletproof otherwise."

Issues Comparison

Z20NET 2.0T 1

● MODERATE
Turbo actuator wear €200--€600 80,000 km--150,000 km

1.2 NA (Z12XEP) 5

● MODERATE
Timing chain tensioner wear €300--€700 80,000 km--150,000 km
○ MINOR
Ignition coil pack degradation €60--€180 60,000 km--120,000 km
○ MINOR
Thermostat failure €80--€200 80,000 km--150,000 km
○ MINOR
Water pump wear €100--€250 100,000 km--180,000 km
○ MINOR
Valve cover gasket seep €50--€150 100,000 km--200,000 km

Models

Z20NET 2.0T 1

Vectra C 2003--2008

1.2 NA (Z12XEP) 4

Corsa B 1998--2000 Agila 1.2 A 2000--2007 Hatchback Corsa 1.2 C 2000--2006 Hatchback Corsa 1.2 D 2006--2014 Hatchback
Full Z20NET 2.0T Report Full 1.2 NA (Z12XEP) Report