1.6 SIDI Turbo A16XHT/A16SHT/B16SHT (MGE) vs 1.2 NA (Z12XEP)
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
1.2 NA (Z12XEP)
ACCEPTABLE
76/100
+2 points over 1.6 SIDI Turbo A16XHT/A16SHT/B16SHT (MGE)
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
1.6 SIDI Turbo A16XHT/A16SHT/B16SHT (MGE)
Opel
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
1.2 NA (Z12XEP)
Opel
Specifications
1.6 SIDI Turbo A16XHT/A16SHT/B16SHT (MGE)
1.2 NA (Z12XEP)
Brand
Opel
Opel
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
74
76
Years
2013--2024
2000--2014
Displacement
1598 cc
1229 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Petrol Turbo
Petrol Na
Power
170--200 hp
80 hp
Known Issues
1
5
Total Risk Cost
€0--€0
€590--€1,480
Character
1.6 SIDI Turbo A16XHT/A16SHT/B16SHT (MGE)
"GM Medium Gasoline Engine: direct injection, chain-driven, 170 PS (A16XHT) or 200 PS (A16SHT/B16SHT) in Astra J/K, Insignia A/B, Cascada, Zafira Tourer. German used-car guides list no known engine problems; watch intake carbon and oil consumption, and avoid high-mileage automatics. Evidence base is still thin."
1.2 NA (Z12XEP)
"Greek city car workhorse. Simple, cheap, 200k+ km proven. Chain tensioner is the one known weakness. Bulletproof otherwise."
Issues Comparison
1.6 SIDI Turbo A16XHT/A16SHT/B16SHT (MGE) 1
● MODERATE
Intake-valve and injector carbon build-up (direct injection)
1.2 NA (Z12XEP) 5
● MODERATE
Timing chain tensioner wear
○ MINOR
Ignition coil pack degradation
○ MINOR
Thermostat failure
○ MINOR
Water pump wear
○ MINOR
Valve cover gasket seep