1.0 Turbo (B10XFT) vs 1.2 NA (Z12XEP)
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
1.2 NA (Z12XEP)
ACCEPTABLE
76/100
+10 points over 1.0 Turbo (B10XFT)
0
/ 100
CAUTION
1.0 Turbo (B10XFT)
Opel
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
1.2 NA (Z12XEP)
Opel
Specifications
1.0 Turbo (B10XFT)
1.2 NA (Z12XEP)
Brand
Opel
Opel
Verdict
CAUTION
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
66
76
Years
2014--2019
2000--2014
Displacement
999 cc
1229 cc
Layout
I3
I4
Type
Petrol Turbo
Petrol Na
Power
90--115 hp
80 hp
Known Issues
5
5
Total Risk Cost
€1,330--€2,950
€590--€1,480
Character
1.0 Turbo (B10XFT)
"3-cylinder city turbo. Thermostat epidemic is the Achilles heel. Adequate power for Corsa weight. Check service history."
1.2 NA (Z12XEP)
"Greek city car workhorse. Simple, cheap, 200k+ km proven. Chain tensioner is the one known weakness. Bulletproof otherwise."
Issues Comparison
1.0 Turbo (B10XFT) 5
● MODERATE
Thermostat failure (epidemic)
● MODERATE
Timing chain stretch (3-cylinder stress)
○ MINOR
Engine mount wear (3-cyl vibration)
○ MINOR
Ignition coil failure
○ MINOR
Turbo wastegate rattle
1.2 NA (Z12XEP) 5
● MODERATE
Timing chain tensioner wear
○ MINOR
Ignition coil pack degradation
○ MINOR
Thermostat failure
○ MINOR
Water pump wear
○ MINOR
Valve cover gasket seep